Skip to content
Contact
Set Up A Call
  • Blog
  • Highly Effective Genco Habit #2: Maintenance Optimization
Share this post
Paul Davis

Paul Davis

Highly Effective Genco Habit #2: Maintenance Optimization

March 28, 2019
/
Energy Trading and Optimization,Wholesale Market Participation

 

Maintenance schedule optimization can be a full-time job, especially with a large, diverse portfolio. It’s a fluid process and the inputs are coming from multiple sources including the market, fuel supplies, weather forecasts, plant operations and your own boss – just to name a few. Simulating an out-of-service unit and comparing profit results with model runs that keep that unit online provide a quantifiable basis for outage scheduling. It’s not a precise science but it is a process that should be done very methodically. It’s also an area that regulators love to explore, so you need to have a defensible, consistent approach when taking units offline for maintenance and testing.

This article will examine a few common near, mid and longer-term scenarios and how a Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch (UC&ED) model can at least provide a consistent basis for decision making. The basic process for each scenario is similar:

 
  1. Begin by updating your model with the latest power and fuel prices, load forecast, deals, known de-rates and outages, initial conditions and other relevant inputs.
  2. Set up several model runs with all things held equal except the specific outage or de-rate scenarios you wish to compare.
 

One of your first runs will be a baseline to which you compare the total profit margin with that of the others. The scenarios may focus on when to take an outage for just one unit, or may have you looking at many different units when planning a maintenance season. Regardless, it is important to collect your results in Excel or a database report, so you can rank them and clearly show how you arrived at the decision.

 
Near-Term Maintenance Optimization

“Near-term” here is defined as being within the week. For example, one of your units just reported a tube leak but can stay online for a few days if needed. You look at the 7-Day UC schedule from this morning and see that there isn’t a great time this week to lose this unit since prices are strong. It’s not a forced outage (yet), so do we keep the unit running for a few days, or shut it down now?

Below, is an example of what the model output might look like. Compared to the baseline scenario with no outage, we see that, given forecasted power and fuel prices, the first window of opportunity for the 2-day outage is the best option. In exercising it, we would communicate to the plant to come offline over the long weekend and fix the issue before higher prices hit later in the week.

 
 
Mid-Term Maintenance Optimization

For our purposes, we define “mid-term” as being around 7-30 days, which generally correlates with the outer reaches of most peoples’ weather forecast “comfort zone”. Some forecast services provide 90-day outlooks, which obviously need to be taken with a few grains of salt. In this time frame, you begin to see requests for various test activities and preventative maintenance such as:

 
  • Hot path inspections
  • Heat rate testing
  • Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
 

The methodology here is very similar to near-term planning, but you may want to run more scenarios since there can be greater discretion about when (and if) it makes sense to take an outage. Because of increased uncertainty, you may want to test low/medium/high LMP forecast scenarios, in addition to weighing the costs and likelihood of those scenarios, which makes things a bit more complex. Qualitative factors may also be considered and, if utilized, must be documented in case your plan is audited.

 
Long-Term Maintenance Optimization

Long-term maintenance planning is more complex for several reasons.  First, there is even more uncertainty associated with a host of factors including, prices, the available asset stack (bilaterals, renewable availability, forced outages, etc.), and weather during less predictable shoulder months.  Your long-term forecast probably reflects (typical) seasonality without attempting to predict the inevitable mid-April freeze or October tropical storm.  What also makes long-term planning more difficult is that you may be looking to take multiple outages at once, and possibly for some very large units.

Stochastic modeling is one way to deal with increasing levels of uncertainty. The modeled output that results from using this method is not a point forecast, but rather a histogram that shows a range of possibilities. After identifying the discrete scenarios for an outage season (initially considering scheduling constraints and total outage capacity limitations), you’d run the model hundreds or even thousands of times, with different price paths (established from forward price, correlations and volatility curves) and forced outages in order to assess a range of possible outputs. The more uncertainty, the wider the histogram or, larger profit standard deviation.

Below is an example of what you might see when comparing opportunity outage costs of three scenarios during a week of the maintenance season.  Each stochastic run needs its own base case and change case to calculate the difference for each run to build the histogram of outage costs. After running all the scenarios, collect the data and award higher rank to the lower average and lower standard deviations of costs to help guide your decision making.

 
 

A somewhat simpler alternative to stochastic modeling incorporates high, low and medium scenarios to get a feel for the range of possible outcomes for each outage option. Your results will depend on how you define your scenarios and the relationship between fuel and power prices. In the following example, it looks like the high price scenario for one of the outage options is actually better than the others, which may be counter-intuitive. It may be that although overall prices are higher in this scenario, the heat-rate spread narrows making the unit less profitable during the proposed outage window. That may signal a good time to go offline compared to others.

 
 

Both of the long-term planning methods described above require more work than a deterministic (spot forecast) approach, but don’t let their complexity deter you from more deeply assessing uncertainty and placing some quantitative structure around your decisions.

Valuing Long-Term Service Agreements (LTSA) is another use case for the stochastic modeling method since the LTSA imposes penalties for exceeding annual run-time and start-up limits.  Simulation of a combined cycle generator, using various start and VOM (Variable Operations and Maintenance) costs, can determine whether the cost of an LTSA is economical.  Here, you would:

 
  1. Input the start-up and run-time limitations detailed in the LTSA and then simulate a year of operations to compare results to other simulations using an alternative maintenance plan. 
  2. Review the output to see which run generates the most profit-taking penalties. 
 

Alternatively, if an LTSA already exists, a stochastic model can help determine what values to use for start-up and VOM costs so that utilization is kept within contractual limits.  Use an iterative approach and vary the VOM and start-up hurdle costs in each set of simulations to arrive at the ones that, on average, yield the most profits.

Becoming a sophisticated, data-driven trading organization doesn’t happen overnight, but the journey is both interesting and rewarding for those who choose it.

 
Up Next…

Look for the next post in our series, “7 Habits of Highly Effective GENCOS”, that will cover Operation & Bidding of Complex Assets.

 

Contact Us if you have any questions for our blog authors or other subject matter experts. To automatically receive email updates when new PCI posts are published, click on the RSS icon in the top right-hand corner of any blog page and copy it into your feed.

 

Paul Davis

Paul Davis

Paul Davis is a senior Enterprise Solutions team director with over 23 years of experience using PCI software in regulated and unregulated power markets. As a solutions director, he works closely with customers and development teams to discover and implement analytics solutions, focusing on portfolio management and machine learning forecast applications. Paul graduated from Auburn with a Bachelor's in Mechanical Engineering, earned a Master's in Finance at Texas A&M, and is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP). Before his career in the energy industry, he served ten years in the Navy as a pilot and naval science instructor.

Related blog posts

Loading...
Mar 22
Energy Trading and Optimization,Portfolio Optimization

Advanced Techniques in Load Forecasting

Jul 26
Energy Trading and Optimization,Portfolio Optimization,Wholesale Market Participation

What You Need to Know About Renewable Energy Optimization Across Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets

Jun 22
Energy Trading and Optimization,ETRM

How to Write Functional Requirements for an ETRM System

Related press

Loading...
Laptop computer with code displayed on the screen
Jan 23
Cybersecurity

PCI Successfully Completes SOC/FISMA Examinations for 2022

Ron Swartz, senior director of Trading Analytics, at PCI Energy Solutions
Jan 11

Energy Trading Product Visionary Ron Swartz Joins PCI Energy Solutions

Transmission Lines
Nov 16
SEEM

Multiple Customers Go Live With the PCI SEEMTrader Platform for Autonomous Power Trading in the Southeast Energy Exchange Market (SEEM)

PCI Energy Solutions

PCI Energy Solutions

Also known as Power Costs, Inc.

Connect with us

U.S. 1+ 405.447.6933

Sales 1+ 405.701.7301

301 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2000
Norman, OK 73072

Contact us

We’re Hiring! 

Linkedin Twitter
  • Energy Trading and Optimization
  • Wholesale Market Participation
  • ETRM
  • Portfolio Optimization
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Gas & Fuels Management
  • Generation Outage Management
  • Company Type
  • Utilities
  • Generators
  • Traders
  • Renewable Energy
  • Asset Managers
  • Retailers
  • About
  • About Us
  • Cybersecurity
  • Leadership
  • Our Technology
  • Newsroom
  • Careers

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe
  • Transmission and Reliability
  • Transmission Outage Management
  • Transmission Scheduling
  • e-Tagging
  • Balancing Authority Operations
  • Energy Accounting
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Sustainable Energy
  • Renewables Trading & Scheduling
  • Energy Storage Optimization & Trading
  • Hydrogen
  • Hydropower
  • Carbon Intensity
  • Markets
  • US ISO/RTO Markets
  • US Bilateral Markets
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • Mexico
  • Europe
  • Australia
  • Thought Leadership
  • Blog
  • Webinars & Events
  • Customer Portal
  • INFOCUS Conference
  • Product Trainings
  • Product Documentation
  • Issue Tracker

© Power Costs, Inc. 2022 | All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

Request More Information

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contact

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe

Name
I am not a robot 🤖

Solutions

Energy Trading and Optimization

  • Wholesale Market Participation
  • ETRM
  • Portfolio Optimization
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Gas & Fuels Management
  • Generation Outage Management
  • Wholesale Market Participation
  • ETRM
  • Portfolio Optimization
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Gas & Fuels Management
  • Generation Outage Management

Transmission and Reliability

  • Transmission Outage Management
  • Transmission Scheduling
  • e-Tagging
  • Balancing Authority Operations
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Energy Accounting
  • Transmission Outage Management
  • Transmission Scheduling
  • e-Tagging
  • Balancing Authority Operations
  • Settlements and Billing
  • Energy Accounting

Sustainable Energy

  • Renewable Energy Trading & Scheduling
  • Energy Storage Optimization & Trading
  • Hydrogen
  • Hydropower
  • Carbon Intensity
  • Renewable Energy Trading & Scheduling
  • Energy Storage Optimization & Trading
  • Hydrogen
  • Hydropower
  • Carbon Intensity

Markets

  • US ISO/RTO Markets
  • US Bilateral Markets
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Europe
  • Australia
  • US ISO/RTO Markets
  • US Bilateral Markets
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Europe
  • Australia

Resources

Thought Leadership

  • Blog
  • Webinars & Events
  • Blog
  • Webinars & Events

Customer Portal

  • INFOCUS Conference 2023
  • Product Trainings
  • Product Documentation
  • Issue Tracker
  • INFOCUS Conference 2023
  • Product Trainings
  • Product Documentation
  • Issue Tracker

About Us

  • About
  • Leadership
  • Newsroom
  • Our Technology
  • Cybersecurity
  • About
  • Leadership
  • Newsroom
  • Our Technology
  • Cybersecurity

Careers

Contact Us